Amusement Equipment Manufacturers

Amusement Equipmen

Amusement Equipment, Inc. was the company that made the iconic, snow-covered elephant rides. The elephants crossed the snowy Alps with relative ease. These rides are still popular today. And, with their classic designs, they can be enjoyed by the whole family. Whether you’re looking for a family-friendly adventure or a more adult theme park, we’ve got the answer.


The Dinis Amusement Equipment Company is a reputable manufacturer of amusement equipment. Its products are internationally recognized and have gained ISO9001 and SON certification. As a result, they are used in theme parks all over the world. The company employs highly skilled designers and welders who use top-quality materials to build their products.

The company also conducts market research to understand the needs of its target customers. The company’s products are attractive and fun to ride. Its commitment to quality and reputation makes Dinis products the preferred choice of domestic and foreign customers. Dinis products help to improve your life. So, don’t hesitate to try them.

Dinis has been in the industry for 20 years, and it has become the leading brand in China. Its annual turnover is close to one hundred million dollars, and it has made a significant contribution to the amusement industry. Its history is one of innovation and expansion, which is what sets it apart from other companies.

Dinis is a leading manufacturer of amusement equipment. Its innovative designs have earned the company the respect of domestic and international customers. The company provides top-quality carnival carousel horse rides. The company’s wide range of products can help you to enhance your amusement park experience.

Among other products, the Dinis trackless train is the perfect choice for indoor and outdoor amusement parks. It is environmentally friendly, inexpensive, and safe. It is also very portable. You can use it in your backyard if space is limited. Dinis also offers customized miniature train rides.


Beston Amusement Equipment Co Ltd is a manufacturer that specializes in amusement rides. The company is engaged in the production, sales, and research of amusement park equipment. The company’s factory is located in Zhengzhou, China. It has a staff of more than 200 people and is spread over 63000 square meters.

The factory is located in Zhengzhou, the provincial capital of Henan province. The company’s main products include big amusement rides, kiddie rides, carousels, bumper cars, and more. The company also sells its products to various amusement parks and supermarkets.

The thrill rides at Beston are very popular with the children and the adults. They are suitable for those who love the thrill of speed. Beston’s thrill rides offer the highest speed and the greatest feeling of thrill. In addition to the thrill rides, the amusement park offers games that visitors can play. They can also win small prizes by participating in the games.

The classic rides are also popular in amusement parks. They have their own charm and appeal, which can draw in more guests. Some of the most popular rides are ferris wheels, carousels, pirate ship rides, and amusement park trains. Beston has a long history of designing and manufacturing all kinds of amusement rides. Its products are always the best sellers in the domestic market.


A lawsuit against the manufacturer of the elephant ride in a theme park erupted in Germany due to an amusement equipment supplier’s failure to deliver the proper equipment. The company, Mordelt in Amusement Equipmen, was part of Amusement Equipment, Inc. and was located at Bahnhofstr. 19, 74249 Jagsthausen, Germany. The case illustrates the importance of a proper contract between the amusement equipment manufacturer and its suppliers. It also outlines a framework for the law of amusement equipment.

While the companies had no previous connection to Louisiana, the contract between Mordelt and Heimo is a unique case. Neither company had any representatives or assets in Louisiana, and the parties negotiated the terms by telex. The contract stipulated that payment for the merchandise would be made through a bank in Florida. The merchandise was to be delivered to Louisiana, but neither company advertised its products in Louisiana or displayed them at a trade show.

Moreover, the court held that the plaintiff failed to establish personal jurisdiction over Mordelt because the plaintiff failed to serve process on him in Louisiana. The due process clause limits the sovereign power of states, but does not eliminate all it. Thus, a plaintiff cannot establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant based on jurisdiction over a third party, as Mordelt acted outside of his official capacity in contract negotiations.

Dinis Amusement Equipment Co., Ltd. has been in the business for over a decade. This company specializes in manufacturing amusement equipment for theme parks and amusement centers. It uses high-quality materials such as fiberglass-reinforced plastic. Moreover, the company uses advanced technologies and techniques to ensure that its products will stand the test of time.


Amusement Equipmen Heimo is a German company that specializes in the manufacturing of rides and entertainment equipment for amusement parks. Founded in 1951, the company is based in Jagsthausen, Germany. The company offers a wide range of products and services for amusement parks.

In order to make the purchase, Amusement Equipment made a contract with Heimo, a German company. The parties negotiated the terms over the phone and through telex. The contract stipulated that the merchandise would be delivered to Florida, but the parties did not meet in person. Moreover, payments were made through a West German bank. The contract stated that the merchandise would be delivered in Florida, but the Amusement Equipment planned to transport the merchandise to New Orleans.

However, the contract between Mordelt and Heimo was not legal. There was no prior business relationship between the two companies. In addition to this, the two companies met in Germany and negotiated terms via telex. The parties agreed that payment for the merchandise would be made through a Florida bank. The parties had never met in Louisiana and the company had not advertised its products in Louisiana. Furthermore, the two companies did not display any products in the Louisiana trade show.

Amusement Equipment’s motion to dismiss was denied because the defendants failed to establish personal jurisdiction. In order to find that personal jurisdiction over the defendants, the court must first establish the defendant’s business existence in Louisiana. In its motion, Amusement Equipment argued that the motion to dismiss was untimely. The court also noted that neither company had enough contacts with Louisiana to establish personal jurisdiction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *